SNAP! The Camera Thread

[Manny M]

I think 28mm might be too wide an angle for portraits... but then again i'm nowhere near an expert. I'd be asking Eibach and Caspian.

[turb06]

i would agree with that. Mate at work picked up a 50mm cannon lense with an f2/* (low number cant remember exactly) brand new for under $400 from photo continental, he uses it for portraits of his little ones and has had some good results its excellent for indoors.

Personnally i like to use my 70-300 IS for close up face shots.

[Serenity]

Thanks, I'll definitely consider it. I bought a portraiture magazine (it was a special edition, Digital Photography Portraits, volume 2) and it implied macro lenses were the go, anything with a low aperture.

[banjoeskimo]

Yep, anything with a low aperture is a good idea, as you'll really need the depth of field they'll provide.

Another way to cheat a little is to use lenses with a particuarly good zoom, as you can achieve nice DOF that way too, but that only works outdoors and in decent lighting (since you'll need space to actually use said zoom, and expecting any low to mid range zoom lense to work effectively in low light environments at all times is more than a little optimistic.)

[Serenity]

Yeah, I'm not getting any lighting kits, they're too costly. I try to use natural light or lamps.

[Manny M]

Lamps?! Bah, get one of these...


http://www.tacticalflashlights.com/flashlight-pics/ST85001.jpg


If you're getting a lens kit with the body, play with those lenses and then you'll know the depth of zoom you need.

[Serenity]

Lol torch. I actually kinda do actually!
I'll show you a rather dodgy photo of it.
I tried to black out the background to make it more effective but I fail at selecting.

http://fc60.deviantart.com/fs38/f/2008/332/0/b/Glow__by_kmw1990.jpg

[Serenity]

SO.
Going to pick up the camera on Thursday.
I rang yesterday to see if they were in stock. Not at the moment. But the guy at the shop, who was very helpful, said they should have some in by Thursday. Not a bad deal, I'm getting the 450D with the 18-55mm for $1070. Probably going to ask about recommended portraiture/macro lenses and see if I can get a moderately priced one (budget 2k) because I'm not getting filters just for a kit lens.

I'm buying through PRA Imaging in Perth, so I have to make sure they stock the leses. What better place to go to than their website?
It's down to these 3. All Canon, nothing they sold in Sigma interested me much.

http://www.praimaging.com.au/d46-56-canon-ef-50mm-f14-usm.html

http://www.praimaging.com.au/d149-56-canon-ef-100mm-f2-usm.html

http://www.praimaging.com.au/d150-56-canon-ef-135mm-f28-with-softfocus.html

[Michaelangelo]

The 50mm/f1.8 is a good starting point. The dropbear I posted above is a good example of what a total noob can achieve with it. It's sharp and fast and only costs $150, so it gives you a good idea of where you might like to take it from that point for a minimal outlay.

Worth considering at any rate.

[Serenity]

Excellent, yeah I saw heaps of that size and aperture so that's definitely something else to keep in mind. Thanks.

[Michaelangelo]

I don't think that's been released yet. It looks amazing though. What I wouldn't do for a full frame camera...

I also discovered today how difficult it is to take photos of people in the late afternoon light when amongst trees and ridiculous winds.

I do however, like that fact that despite immense failings, this is still quite fun. Alriiiight.

[Serenity]

I need help urgently. My dad has gone all Nazi on my butt and told me not to buy a lens because apparently the new Canon ones are all plastic and crap whereas the older ones are better quality. I know that's not right.

[Clockw0rk]

Buy it anyway and prove him wrong?

[Blue]

He's... wrong.

Tell him to do his homework.

[Serenity]

SO.

I went in there fully expecting to get a 450D, went looking for the bloody place for an hour in the morning, turns out we went the wrong way. Street numbers aren't easily marked in the Perth CBD. Turns out, when we finally got there, the last 450D was sold an hour beforehand. Meh. I was talked into a 1000D, apparently the only major difference is the megapixels. Takes good photos. Got a Sigma 70 mm macro lens too, takes crisp pics. Asked about the EX430 Speedlite or watever order it's in, didn't have any. Didn't seem to have too much there. Got $300 knocked off what I woulda paid otherwise though.

[PrattP]

I'm kind of looking for a new digital camera, and there are some pretty awesome deals around atm.

My questions though is, why is a 10.3 MP Kodak $150 while a 7.2 MP Sony Cybershot $177, or 8MP Sony $248.

Am I wrong in assuming more MP = generally better photos? I do realise lens has to do with it, but these have very similar features and I don't know what to go with.

[Michaelangelo]

Am I wrong in assuming more MP = generally better photos?


Very much so. More MP = bigger printing options.

The megapixel race has gotten to the point (as far as compact point and shoot cameras go, anyway) where I think more megapixels is a bad thing. Cramming more pixels onto the same size sensor generally means more noise (digital grain), which ruins your low light capabilities. I think for a point and shoot, the 6-8MP range is the sweet spot for noise performance vs printing size options.

The Kodak is so cheap because they aim for the absolute beginner market. These people have less of a critical eye for image quality, and generally wont notice the inferior performance.

Sony are generally ok. They have great build quality, which is handy if it's going to be your party pocket camera, and the image quality will slay the Kodak. Check out anything from Canon in your price range too, as their image quality is top notch, although you might not get something small enough to fit into your pocket comfortably without stretching up to their Ixus range (which I highly recommend doing).

[PrattP]

Yeah I have noticed the Canons. Ixus is $248 in my catalogue, so that's still OK.

If not, I'm thinking then the Sony Cybershot. I've always trusted Sony, and it's a pretty sweet looking little camera also.

Thanks heaps for your help!

[Michaelangelo]

No problem.

If it's the Ixus 80 IS in your catalogue (which is generally going for that price), then I thoroughly recommend it. I take mine pretty much everywhere and it does a great job.

[PrattP]

Yep that's the one. One of my mates has a Canon as well, and it's awesome. So yeah depending on what's to spare in my wallet, I'll choose. :P Thanks mate.

[StorminNorman]

Note that the 80IS is superseded by the 85IS, which is what I have. I believe the primary difference is that one is a 7.1MP camera while the other is a 10MP camera. They look pretty much identical other than that, though.

I'd avoid Sony because they require you to use their own proprietary memory card format, which costs twice as much as SD cards do.

All the talk about DSLRs in this thread is making me want to buy one now.

[PrattP]

Yeah I realise that too. I have an older Sony one now, so it's no biggie for me.

[Surgeon.]

My new collection with 1000D

So, who should I start stalking?

http://img380.imageshack.us/img380/4594/dscf1424em0.jpg

[Serenity]

Did you get filters, man?

[Surgeon.]

Did you get filters, man?

No, should I have?

[Blue]

Yep that's the one. One of my mates has a Canon as well, and it's awesome. So yeah depending on what's to spare in my wallet, I'll choose. :P Thanks mate.Buy the IXUS. They are the best digital cameras. If I ever need to buy a digital camera, it will be an IXUS. They're brilliant.

Also, **** filters.

[Serenity]

At least a UV filter, it minimises glare and protects the lens.

[turb06]

and they are cheap as heck on ebay.

[Sir_Psycho]

Anyone else on the forums into wet photography?

[StorminNorman]

I've already mentioned this in the Post Your Photography thread, but seeing as how this thread is about actual cameras, I think it's better to talk about it here.

First up, I turned 30 last Saturday, and as a birthday present to myself*, I got a new camera. (http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=30324292&l=7f591&id=1058808093)

Now, I need to understand some things. I've read the manual, but that's only good for explaining the function of things, which is not what I need. What I need is information on why I should choose a particular shooting mode. I'm talking about the manual modes like P and Tv and whatnot.

I've been doing some research on this myself, but I wanted to hear the opinions of people here as well, because I'm new to this whole "real cameras" thing.

If anyone has tips and tricks to share, I'd love to hear those, too.

*: Not entirely true: Everyone in my family gave me some money to put towards the camera. I made up the difference with money I've been saving for a while now.

[Michaelangelo]

It depends on your situation. Say you're shooting something moving fast. To get a blur-free shot you might need a shutter speed of 1/500s or faster. So you'd pick Tv, dial in that shutter speed, and then the camera chooses other settings like aperture, ISO, etc to create a properly exposed shot.

Another example, you're shooting a portrait and want the background as blurred out as possible. You might therefore dial in the largest aperture (smallest f-number) in Av mode, and again let the camera choose the appropriate shutter speed, ISO, etc.

P mode is basically auto. You can control things like ISO and white balance, but the camera will choose the most appropriate shutter and aperture combination. It's a good place to start.

[StorminNorman]

Okay, thanks for that.

One thing I've found hard to get used to is the idea that the viewfinder doesn't necessarily represent what the CCD will actually pick up in terms of exposure. The live preview mode is helpful with this, where I can check what's going through to the CCD.

[Richie]

Just been reading through the thread for a good buy in small digital cameras and everyone is raving on about the IXUS 80, so I'll probably by that I'm not too fussed. Just wondering if it can record videos at all and if they are any good. Also what's the average price I can only see it on WOW for $279 and JB for $296

[/backslash]

Just been reading through the thread for a good buy in small digital cameras and everyone is raving on about the IXUS 80, so I'll probably by that I'm not too fussed. Just wondering if it can record videos at all and if they are any good. Also what's the average price I can only see it on WOW for $279 and JB for $296
I bought my IXUS 80 for $240 I think (in October). I'm sure I've seen it in Big W for $248 but you might want to ring first. Also checkout my DeviantArt page (http://backslashio.deviantart.com/) for photos taken with the IXUS 80 for examples of quality :) Easily the best cheapish pointnshoot on the market

[Lazlow]

Okay, received the Pentax Spotmatic SPII I bought off eBay, search high and low for a battery, and have bought a 4-pack of 400 ISO film. I remember most parts of these cameras except;

http://whitemetal.com/pentax/spotmaticii/spotmaticii_06.jpg

Loaded film reminder dial underneath film rewind knob is marked "20" or "36" in white (black and white), "20" or "36" in red (color) and "EMP".

EMP = ??

[/backslash]

EMP = ??
Electro Magnetic Pulse (from what I learned from 'The Matrix' movie :p)

[Mellomaniac]

I just bout a Canon IXUS100. now it's my first digital camera (have used my parents in the past) but i must say so far im pretty happy with the quality of the pics. just need to read the manual to work out all the features and all.

[StorminNorman]

One of the professional photographers on the Manifest committee had his camera die on him, and with an event coming before he'll be able to get it repaired, I offered the use of my 450D. He said that would be cool, but suggested I pick up this lens (http://www.digitalcamerawarehouse.com.au/prod4358.htm) for it. A bit of searching reveals that, despite the price, this is apparently quite a good lens, and is known as the "nifty fifty" in photography circles.

Given that what we'll be doing is mostly going to be portraiture (if you saw that article about cosplayers in yesterday's Age, then it'll be one of those, except it'll be for a Manifest press release rather than a Supanova one), this lens seems like a great choice to me.

Anyone have any thoughts on it? I honestly think that $130 seems like ridiculously good value for what you get with this lens, so I'm tempted by it. It will be for me as much as for the guy borrowing my camera, too. In return, he's offered to show me some photography tricks and techniques.

[Serenity]

Ooh, looks good. I've been wanting to get into prime lenses too.

[/backslash]

One of the professional photographers on the Manifest committee had his camera die on him, and with an event coming before he'll be able to get it repaired, I offered the use of my 450D. He said that would be cool, but suggested I pick up this lens (http://www.digitalcamerawarehouse.com.au/prod4358.htm) for it. A bit of searching reveals that, despite the price, this is apparently quite a good lens, and is known as the "nifty fifty" in photography circles.

Given that what we'll be doing is mostly going to be portraiture (if you saw that article about cosplayers in yesterday's Age, then it'll be one of those, except it'll be for a Manifest press release rather than a Supanova one), this lens seems like a great choice to me.

Anyone have any thoughts on it? I honestly think that $130 seems like ridiculously good value for what you get with this lens, so I'm tempted by it. It will be for me as much as for the guy borrowing my camera, too. In return, he's offered to show me some photography tricks and techniques.
Somebody recommended the same lens to me for that camera in this thread (or was it the other camera thread?), sheeps/Lazlow I think

[Lazlow]

Totally wouldn't have been me :p

[turb06]

may have been me. An guy in our IT department has this lense and its great. I prefer the versatility of a zoom lense so i never got one myself.

[Blue]

Somebody recommended the same lens to me for that camera in this thread (or was it the other camera thread?), sheeps/Lazlow I thinkA few of us did. I still want to pick it up myself, for portability's sake.

[/backslash]

I'm really tempted to pick one up now, the 450D (body only) for $815 is a pretty good price combining those with the lens chosen. Has it lowered in price much since it came out or is it roughly the same?

[Michaelangelo]

The nifty fifty is terrific. You'll be amazed what you can do with it in low light. And it's incredibly sharp. The only downer is the cheap build quality, but just treat it right and you'll be laughing.

[Blue]

I spoke to a photographer for Triple M at the Jet gig a few months ago, and mentioned that I didn't have a speedlite, and she told me that she doesn't even use one. Obviously, they don't let you use them at gigs, so she told me to pick up one of those lenses, because they're really great for low light. As long as you're at the front of the audience, the lack of zoom won't be a problem. As far as built quality goes, it won't exactly fall apart in your hands. You should always be treating your equipment with care, I really don't see it being an issue.

Shit, a 450D and one of those for ~$950 is a no brainer.

[/backslash]

So the lens posted on the previous page only have a zoom lens of 0.15x? Shit. I'm one of those people where I'm always wishing for more zoom :( Especially since I do more landscapes than portraits

Any decent cheap-ish zoom lenses for around $200? Also how far would it be able to zoom in? (give me a scale in metres since I don't really understand the technical terms)

[StorminNorman]

Happy 50th birthday, Nikon F-mount! (http://i.gizmodo.com/5181110/happy-50th-birthday-nikon-f-mount)

EDIT, some hours later: I now have a nifty fifty.

[/backslash]

Can someone please recommend me a cheap decent zoom lens for the Canon 450D? Would like to know if one exists :p

Also congrats on the nifty-fifty purchase Stormin :)

[Lazlow]

On a similar note, are all old timey lenses compatible with old timey cameras?

The Pentax Spotmatic came with a standard 35mm lens and a Macro lense, but I'd like to get a zoom lens.

[StorminNorman]

Different manufacturers have their own lens mount standards.

Your Pentax uses something called the M42 mount, which seems to have been common on Pentax SLRs of the time. It was first introduced in 1949, and was widely adopted due to its relative simplicity. Apparently there's even support for it today, so it may be possible to find M42 lenses from the past few years that work with your camera.

As an aside, I couldn't find anything about what that EMP thing was.

[StorminNorman]

RIP Kodachrome. (http://homepage.1000words.kodak.com/default.asp?item=2388083)

Also, the Olympus E-P1 (http://gizmodo.com/5292179/olympus-e+p1-micro-four-thirds-camera-goes-legit-with-123mp-720p-video) is completely awesome. Basically a "rangefinder-style" digital camera, meaning that it's relatively compact, while still allowing for things like interchangeable lenses. I actually really want one of these just for point-and-shoot purposes.

OdZuYGjSFzg

[VanAce]

Hey guys. Just a question about cameras. My digital camera wont connect to my computer anymore for some reason. Its not the SD card as the SD card work fine on other computers. I checked to see any relevant services might of been disabled but that doesn't seem to be the case.

[incompatible with life]

Well, going on the assumption you have a card reader, do you really need to connect your camera with your computer?

Otherwise I assume you've tried the usual things like re-installing the software, checking if your camera will connect to other computers, etc?

[VanAce]

Well, going on the assumption you have a card reader, do you really need to connect your camera with your computer?

Otherwise I assume you've tried the usual things like re-installing the software, checking if your camera will connect to other computers, etc?

It works with other computers and it works fine i think i must of changed a process on it or something I think will just get a card reader as they are cheap and I need one when I pick up a micro SD card next week.

[Manny M]

Thinking of kicking it up a notch and buying a Canon 50D... although there are rumors Canon will announce the 60D this month. Fingers crossed!

[Lazlow]

Is there much to making an old school cable shutter release? Only tutes I can find on the web are for DSLRs and the only cables I can find on eBay come out of China.

For reference I have a Pentax Spotmatic SPII.

[StorminNorman]

I was in Michaels in the city today, happily fondling an Olympus EP-1 when I mentioned I was also after a wide angle lens for my 450D.

The guy at the shop told me they had this lens (http://www.tamron.com/lenses/prod/11_18mm.asp) on special at the moment, due to it being superseded soon. It's been marked down from $900 to $400, which seemed like a total bargain to me, so I bought it.

All I can say at this point is that by the gods does it take some nice photos. I'll try to get some shots with it up in the photography thread in the next few days.

Oh, also, the EP-1 is a completely awesome camera. I am totally going to get one.

[Blue]

There's a second hand camera store six doors down from Michael's. Definitely worth a look for good second hand gear.

[StorminNorman]

I'll have to check it out. Is that on Elizabeth Street or Little Bourke Street?

[Manny M]

Sooo, anyone else excited to hear what Canon's going to announce soon? Rumors are next week. 60D, 7D and a new bunch of lenses. I've been holding out on an upgrade for this.

[banjoeskimo]

Apparently there'll be a new variant of the 500D too, with RAW video. Which is good, because if all they're doing is upgrading the video I can just pick up the regular 500D at a discounted price.

[Manny M]

Not even interested in grabbing a 50/60D as your next upgrade? I would've thought the increased shutter speed alone would be enough for you to want it.

[Michaelangelo]

Raw video WTF?

[banjoeskimo]

Not even interested in grabbing a 50/60D as your next upgrade? I would've thought the increased shutter speed alone would be enough for you to want it.

For $450 US extra? Dude, I'm broke, if I had money I'd have upgraded beyond the 350D long ago. :p

It's nice, but realistically, I can't think of a situation where I'd be shooting above 1/4000th of a second, and in 4 years of doing this seriously I've never even had to do it, so...

Besides, lense money. I need this puppy far more than I'll ever need that shutter speed (http://www.amazon.com/Canon-EF-S-10-22mm-3-5-4-5-Digital/dp/B0002Y5WXE/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1251424163&sr=8-1).

[Lazlow]

So no one can help my shutter cable remote plight?

I really don't want to have to order from China.

Even Cashies turned up nothing, shit even they've moved onto digital.

[StorminNorman]

Besides, lense money. I need this puppy far more than I'll ever need that shutter speed (http://www.amazon.com/Canon-EF-S-10-22mm-3-5-4-5-Digital/dp/B0002Y5WXE/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1251424163&sr=8-1).

The Tamron lens (http://www.tamron.com/lenses/prod/11_18mm.asp) I bought yesterday for $400 is apparently better than that Canon lens. Perhaps you should look around for it?

Or is there another reason you want the Canon?

EDIT: Just realised that lens is a fair bit faster than the Tamron (F/3.5-4.5 vs F/4.5-5.6).

[Manny M]

What do we think of Canon's new 7D (http://canon.com.au/products/cameras/digital_slr/eos7d_body.aspx)?

Here are the key features;

18 Megapixel
8 fps
1080P video recording at 30 fps
dual Digic 4 processors
19 point AF


I was looking at upgrading my 400D to the 50D, but might invest in a bit extra for the 7D (a 'bit' being double...). It's released in October so i'll wait to see what the response is then.

[Michaelangelo]

I don't know what to make of the 7D. 18mp at 8fps makes it seem like the ultimate sports camera, but I hardly think anyone in "the business" is going to ditch full frame any time soon. If anything it's just going to make people entering the semi-pro market looking at the xxD range think "what if..."


So from a business point of view, I guess it's brilliant.

[Manny M]

I'm yet to read it in its entirety, but the 7D preview from DPReview (http://www.dpreview.com/previews/canoneos7d/) looks really promising.

I've placed my name on the waiting list for it at discount digital photographics, who are selling the body for around $2,200.

[Blue]

Well, I'd already gone through all the bullshit decision-making that had landed me with a 5D, and now this rocks up. 8FPS, ****, that's very nice. The viewfinder sounds pretty good, too.

But … It just isn't full-frame. Such a nice camera, otherwise.

[Serenity]

I hate the idea of video in a DSLR. If you have enough money to buy a DSLR, surely you'd just buy a video camera. It's so gimmicky. Spend more time on the photography side of it, Canon/Nikon/whoever else who offers video recording on DSLRs.

[banjoeskimo]

It's fine. If there were any significant lack of quality / enhancements in the new cameras, I'd complain, but there isn't. The 500D / 7D are entirely consistent with previous upgrades in their respective lines.

[Serenity]

Yeah, I just don't like how they're trying to hook into the high level P&S market with the video capabilities. But I suppose it's making them money. If it ever compromised performance at all, it should be scrapped. First and foremost is the picture quality.

[Blue]

I don't think P&S buyers are going to start hauling around a DSLR that is five times the size of their P&S, simply because of this video capability. P&S cameras can do video as well. I'd say that they're more likely to attract a few buyers who would have otherwise purchased a low-end video camera.

Of course, this only really applies to the 500D. In the case of this 7D, it's just too expensive for the video mode to be considered a value-add.

[Serenity]

It's just like the picture modes. Nobody serious would ever use them.

[StorminNorman]

Project 10-50: (http://www.project10-50.com/) Photograph 2010 with your 50mm prime lens.

Note that this isn't just limited to Nifty Fifty owners. Anyone with a 50mm prime lens for their camera can participate.

[Clockw0rk]

Got my replacement camera from insurance (old one was a Powershot A630, stolen a few weeks back).

Apparently the equivalent replacement for the A630 is...
The Canon SX20is (I think that's the model name).

My $500 point n shoot has been replaced by a $900 awesomebox.
I was going to use a bit of cash to upgrade to an SLR but opted to upgrade my TV instead (which has also been replaced).

Sweeeet!

[banjoeskimo]

So bad it's good.

H_H8TOKcfjg

[Nic Xtreme]

Over the next two months I'm going to be eyeing the market for a DSLR (moving out soonish means I can't keep using my parents' :(), and I was wondering if anyone could post some links to some reputable online Australian stores so I can gather a sort of database of sites to compare trends and costs or keep an eye on the phasing out (and thus clearing out) of older models over this time period in conjunction with retail stores before I make my decision.

Any help would be much appreciated! I've already got www.digitalcamerawarehouse.com.au as well as www.praimaging.com.au on my list.

[Serenity]

PRA in Perth is where I bought my 1000D. Why are you looking at PRA if you're in Bribie?

[Nic Xtreme]

PRA in Perth is where I bought my 1000D. Why are you looking at PRA if you're in Bribie?

I'm assuming they ship to QLD? It's also an additional price trend source.

[Serenity]

They do, yeah, it's just you'd be close to decent camera stores in Brisbane who'd have good prices. I only got my camera in Perth because I couldn't physically get it where I live.

[turb06]

I'm assuming they ship to QLD? It's also an additional price trend source.

i couldnt find a 400D cheaper anywhere than digital camera warehouse, i even got Wow to price match there web price as i didnt want my first purchase from them to be $1400.

[banjoeskimo]

Okay, so this isn't definite yet, but I think I might be selling my camera (a Canon 350D, w/ 18-55mm lense) in the next few weeks.

I remember someone wanting to buy it (I think it was /backslash?), but I'm not sure. If that someone is still interested, know that I'm currently looking in to an upgrade and I'll probably be looking to sell within the next 2 months or less, so if you're still interested, send me a PM. I'm not certain on the price, but I'm thinking around the $250 AUD mark.

It's still in "Millenium Falcon" condition, i.e. she doesn't look like much but she's got it where it counts. :p

As it turns out, one of my friends had a legit copy of Adobe After Effects that for some bizarre reason didn't want (even when told what it's worth), and it looks like I can probably get 500+ for it on eBay. So between that and selling the 350D, it looks as though a shiny new 500D is in my future.

[Serenity]

I know someone who will definitely be interested (Slashy).

[/backslash]

Ooh, $250 eh? Also when you say "Millenium Falcon" condition does that mean it has rust & scatches all over the place? :p Pics? Also what are the disadvantages of the 350D versus the 500D besides a better screen & more MP?

edit: Wait...banjoeskimo is Eibach? Why'd you change your username? :( Now it sounds lame

[banjoeskimo]

I changed my username so it was consistent with my website, email address, and PSN / XBL IDs. Eibach wasn't bad, but honestly? It's the name of a German auto parts company... it was a decision I made when I was 14 because it "sounded cool." Mostly I just didn't want to confuse people on here if I added them to XBL / PSN.

Pics will be forthcoming when I can borrow a friend's camera.

Millenium Falcon condition can be described as the following:

-Bottom of body is covered in scratches
-My name is engraved on the bottom of the body
-Decals next to the buttons on the lower left of the body have worn away from extensive use
-Lense has been heavily modified so that it can be used with non-Canon bodies, and has grip tape on the front to aid with focusing. (It still works fine, it just looks weird)
-Minor dust specs occasionally appear in photos with large amounts of blue sky (usually I just get rid of these with the patch tool in Photoshop)

Main reasons I need / want a 500D over my existing camera:

-Increased resolution. I simply need it if I want to print anything large scale, and there are job offers I've had to decline simply because the finished product needed to be printed at a resolution my current camera simply isn't capable of. I've basically lost money, and worse, full-time gigs as a professional photographer simply because of resolution. I straight up need a more powerful camera.

-Self cleaning sensor. Pretty self explanatory.

-I can shoot a greater number of frames per second in RAW. Absolutely essential if I want to be shooting anything parkour / sports related in something besides JPEG.

-I'm a tech junkie. I don't think I'll use them much, but the idea of an HDMI port on my camera and the ability to shoot HD video does sound kinda fun.

[Serenity]

Maybe I should start using my dad's 20D more but I'm really comfortable with my 1000D. The images I get out of mine are really punchy but Dad's seems to have better image quality.

[/backslash]

Eibach wasn't bad, but honestly? It's the name of a German auto parts company... it was a decision I made when I was 14 because it "sounded cool." Mostly I just didn't want to confuse people on here if I added them to XBL / PSN.
Still sounds a lot better than my deftones_oz username I used to have when I was 14 :p Only germans probably would've picked up that name anyway

I can see when you'd need the extra resolution. I'm in a similar boat, I've already got an 8MP camera and there's quite a few occasions where I wish I had higher MP because I tend to do a lot of cropping to make a good shot since I don't have good enough zoom (and even if I had an SLR, I'd most likely carry the standard to avoid adding more weight). And the self cleaning sensor seems like a must-have feature + the general condition of the camera itself since I've never owned anything like the Millenium Falcon :p I'll have to give it another think. Its starting to sound like I want a 500D with a kit lens for $250, which is probably true, lol

[Serenity]

Don't rule out the 1000D either, Slashy. It's the cheapest of the newer ones.

[Blue]

Yeah, it's a really nice point-and-shoot.

[Serenity]

Ouch! >_<

[StorminNorman]

Ololololol.

I'm deciding whether or not to replace my IXUS with a Powershot S90 or an EP-1. I'm happy to save for either, so cost isn't a problem, it's just a question of whether or not I want a single-lens camera or a glass investment.

[banjoeskimo]

I'll have to give it another think. Its starting to sound like I want a 500D with a kit lens for $250, which is probably true, lol

Well, it depends what you want to use it for, and how much money you've got. If you're looking for an introductory SLR and you're going to be using it for personal use, it's a good camera. It's very used, but it still works well, and the only thing that really impacts performance is the odd dust spec on the lense.

Are you looking to shoot professionally with it, or are you just looking for an SLR to get you started?

Also, I can't be reading that right... a 500D for $250? Retail price for even the 1000D starts at about $900 AUD unless you're getting it on sale.

[/backslash]

Well, it depends what you want to use it for, and how much money you've got. If you're looking for an introductory SLR and you're going to be using it for personal use, it's a good camera. It's very used, but it still works well, and the only thing that really impacts performance is the odd dust spec on the lense.

Are you looking to shoot professionally with it, or are you just looking for an SLR to get you started?

Also, I can't be reading that right... a 500D for $250? Retail price for even the 1000D starts at about $900 AUD unless you're getting it on sale.
I'm looking for an SLR to get started but at the same time I'd like one that's a bit more future proof (and of course in brand new/better condition). Probably not going to shoot professionally but those extra MP could come in handy

And with the 500D for $250 I was just kidding, that's a price I'd like to pay for one but it aint gonna happen :D

[/backslash]

Anyone used a Pentax K-X? Seems to me as thought the quality of images are even better than that in the same league as the Canon 450D/500D (no overuse of DNR, pictures seem to be crisp instead of soft when viewed at max resolution) and its much better for the beginner sort of user.

There's some samples here:
http://www.dpreview.com/gallery/pentaxkx_samples/

Price is pretty good too, can easily be bought locally for around $750 with kit lens. Slight downfall however is that it uses 4xAAs and whilst they can be rechargeable I much prefer battery packs

[Serenity]

You'll have to get Canon mounts.

Also does anyone know if L series lenses work well with the 7D?

[/backslash]

What is the amount of zoom difference between a 18-55mm & a 50-200mm lense? 400%?

Also Serenity told me what ISO is for (like a couple of days ago), I feel like an idiot now for leaving it on auto whilst shooting in horrid conditions & using flash on occasions :p

[/backslash]

I got a new camera <_< And I found out my IXUS80 actually takes much better macro shots when its on a perfectly flat surface!

http://home.exetel.com.au/backslashio/IMG_1706.JPG

In case you're wondering, I'm using Sanyo Eneloops with the new K-X firmware that makes the batteries last for longer & I'm using a Sandisk 8gb Extreme III SD card. As for the bag I've got this coming in the mail

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/31etKk5lX2L._SS400_.jpg

Lowepro Altus 160, actually meant for camcorders but fits the body+twin lens perfectly with very little leftover space, just what I want

[/backslash]

Bought a Benro Tripod Aluminium Travel Angel A-068 M8 +BH-00M - $215 incl free p&h from Photo Shop Studio

http://benro.cn/Upimg/8704955e-8c50-4da7-83de-10c18ccb2053.jpg

They're basically replicas of the more popular Gitzo which costs 4 times as much. Heard good stuff about the Benro & whilst I could've gone for a cheapo $30-50 one they've been known to break easily due to cheap material that can't handle the weight or the weather (gust of wind making it fall down or heavy lenses) or stability (wobbling producing blurry shots). I'm a sucker for quality products too and tbh its better than having a smashed $800 camera to worry about

[/backslash]

Man I feel like I'm talking to myself here :p Any recommendations on cheap-ish filters that I should probably know about? Like polarized ones that block out the sunlight reflections?

[Blue]

Pentax. Interesting choice!

I know nothing about filters, at all. Have fun with it!

I grabbed a 580EX II during the week. Beast.

[/backslash]

I've been reading it up at bit on Whirlpool & the Hoya Circular Polarising 52mm Filter for my 50-200mm lens seems to be the best choice. Looking at $52 from Digidirect.com.au (+$10 for p&h), seems like a good deal. I've got polarized sunglasses which is partially the reason why I want them since I can easily see the difference without using the filter

As for the camera itself, its good stuff :)

[/backslash]

Bought these filters from CitiWide:

Flower Shape Lens Hood - AUD$8.00
Kenko Pro1D Digital Circular-PL Multi-Coated Filter - AUD$47.50
Kenko Pro1D Pro ND8 Filter - AUD$39.00

Buying those Pro1Ds locally (also known as Hoya, same manufacturer as Kenko) would've easily cost me $100 each so I saved a bunch there. I paid an extra $25 to have it shipped by express rather than a 2-4 week wait

For those who don't know what these filters do, The first one basically work like polarised sunglasses, saturating colours & blocking sunlight but without decreasing the brightness. The second one works by allowing slower shutter speeds & being able to blur the movement, for stuff like a waterfall for example instead of having that freeze frame of water falling, this'll make it appear as though the water looks like silk with no rough appearance so it turns this
http://www.hoyafilter.com/products/hoya/images-pro1d/SP-ND8-Without.jpg
into this:
http://www.hoyafilter.com/products/hoya/images-pro1d/SP-ND8-With.jpg
Works on other objects too, like moving cars where the car is static but the background is blurred so you can get the sense of speed.

Imo these filters are must-haves for someone like me who's into landscapes & trying to avoid photoshopping

[/backslash]

Pentax. Interesting choice!
Really does take excellent photos pretty much all the time (well, around the frontyard/backyard, my house interior is very dull to look at), handy having an image stabiliser built into the camera itself, rather than being strictly an expensive lens option. Rarely get a blurred photo, I only get one when I struggle to hold the camera in certain positions. Also weighs an extra 100g when compared to the 450D :(

Got my tripod shipped today, really eager to do some landscape photos with it especially with polarised filters. Should look awesome :D

[StorminNorman]

Do you have a wide-angle lens? Landscape photography really comes into its own if you can rock the wide angle.

In unrelated news, Olympus have announced the PEN EPL-1 (http://gizmodo.com/5462364/olympus-pen-e+pl1-thankfully-includes-built+in-flash-and-200-cheaper-price-point), a cheaper version of the EP-1 with a built in flash.

I'm kind of glad I held off on the EP-1, because this looks like a much better option if I'm going to go Micro Four Thirds as a secondary camera.

[/backslash]

I have no idea. I'm guessing probably not? Just got the twin kit lens

[Serenity]

Nope, those are technically telephotos. Anything with a zoom that's not of a specific kind, eg wide angle, macro (but even most macros) can be classified as telephoto.

[/backslash]

So can I use some adapter thingy or does it need to be a totally new expensive lens? Got any examples?'

I'm slowly getting used to my new tripod but its still not the quick setup I was imagining. Its pretty awesome though how it folds into such a small size (35cm) considering how big it seems when its all folded out. Plus when its fully extended its very easy to pick it up & move it about :) Doesn't feel heavy at all

[Serenity]

Yours are already telephoto.

[/backslash]

No I meant for wide angles

[Blue]

If you're not talking full-frame, you're not really talking wide-angle. The 1.6 crop factor will assist with any telephoto work, however.

[/backslash]

I don't know what I'm talking about :p But buying a separate wide angle lens for my Pentax seems to be incredibly expensive and not something I'd be willing to buy right now. So instead I purchased some more camera gear <_<

Both items from Servaas.com.au

Professional Camera Shoulder Bag - $49.95

http://servaas.com.au/images/BD400A_1.jpg

I know I bought a bag recently but I wanted something that didn't say "steal me" because of its shape and the Lowepro branding on it making it seem like there's an expensive camera in there - I wouldn't want to leave it on a bench for 5 seconds anywhere. This'll be a lot more subtle and could be a good general bag too for taking trips into the city & not wanting to lug around my backpack if I know I'm going to buy something

Maha Powerex MH-C204W One Hour Travel Charger + 8 x IMEDION AA - $69.95

http://servaas.com.au/images/204W_2xAA4IH.jpg

I got a refund for the 2nd packet of Sanyo eneloops I bought for my camera and got this charger + 8 additional better batteries. Already got a charger for my eneloops but it takes up to 12 hours and even then the charger won't turn itself off or reduce the power output, thus leading to overcharging & shortened lifespan. This charger however charges 2 AAs in 1 hour or 4AAs in 2 hours and after they're charged it'll go into an idle mode. Got a bunch of other nifty features as well which makes it much better than any other standard charger :) Still annoying that I have to deal with AAs though, hate them :(

[/backslash]

Shoulder bag is not as good as it seemed, after taking it to the Perth meetup its a bit of a pain to walk around with it since it won't stay on my back comfortably. I think I found the Lowepro bag easier to carry even though its bulkier :(

Bought a Hoya HD UV Filter (the most expensive one but got it imported so I saved $50) for my lens since I figured it'll be on there for long periods of time & as its high quality glass it'll be a lot easier to clean than the Pro1 series. Think I'm done with filters now though :p

[Blue]

Sorry dude, all of the money you spent on, well, extraneous crap, you could have put towards a back or lens. :p

I carried my camera around my neck every day for a month in London; through rain, mosh pits, airports and inebriation. My camera bag (free with my camera) didn't leave my room once. The camera came back in better condition than when it left. :cool:

[/backslash]

Sorry dude, all of the money you spent on, well, extraneous crap, you could have put towards a back or lens. :p

I carried my camera around my neck every day for a month in London; through rain, mosh pits, airports and inebriation. My camera bag (free with my camera) didn't leave my room once. The camera came back in better condition than when it left. :cool:
The filters or the bags or both? :p Well I still think they're worth it in its own way but yeah it is disappointing when I think how $200 could've easily gone towards a better lens, like a Sigma 17-70mm

[Blue]

The filters or the bags or both? :p Well I still think they're worth it in its own way but yeah it is disappointing when I think how $200 could've easily gone towards a better lens, like a Sigma 17-70mmWell, both bags, and probably the filters as well. But nah, that's just me. I mean, I just dropped $650 on a 580EX II Speedlite. :p As long as you're going to get use out of them.

I'm about 75% of my way towards picking up my 5D. Combine it with a battery grip and my new flash unit, and I'll have a beast. The only problem is, I'll have to look around for a new lens, as my pathetic nifty fifty will be puny in comparison. :cool:

[Silverwolf]

Sorry dude, all of the money you spent on, well, extraneous crap, you could have put towards a back or lens. :p

Its what slashy does man, he was born to buy superfluous accessories.

[/backslash]

Exactly :p

[Blue]

Its what slashy does man, he was born to buy superfluous accessories.Hell, he probably bought a vibrator for his Fleshlight. :p

[Italian Stallion]

Picked up a Pentax K-x. $720 including 2 years extended warranty, it seemed to be the best value for money. I probably would've settled for any of the 3 if the price was right.. they all seem to get pretty great reviews, and as a beginner in the dslr world I really have no preference for brand! The main bummer with the K-x is the AA battery thing, but I have heaps of them laying around so I'll live. One problem I have had is that my PC isn't detecting the camera when connected via USB. About to power up my laptop and try that, but I might have a potential issue already!

Couple of other quick questions: Are those super fast SD cards worth getting? At $90 for 16GB they're basically double the price of regular stuff. Will I need one/should I get one?

Also I've ordered a hoya skylight lens filter, which I was told was best for standard shooting and shizzle. Also thinking of getting a wide angle one? Is there much difference in quality in these things, or is it all basically the same? Also bags & tripods. Recommendations without spending heaps! I don't want a dodgy eBay China $2 plastic tripod though. Something that won't get my camera killed. :p

PS. thanks to all who offered help earlier!

[/backslash]

Well done getting the Pentax :D

Good price considering the extended warranty. Not sure why the PC didn't detect the camera, did you attach the cable, then turned on the camera? It doesn't work if you plug it in whilst the camera's turned on. Make sure you update the firmware to fix battery issues

http://www.pentax.jp/english/support/digital/k-x_s.html

For the SD card I got my Sandisk Extreme III 8gb for $40. Its not as fast as the other ones out there (15-20mbps I think) but its more suited for extreme temperatures if you ever go somewhere thats really cold or really hot

For the tripod, get a Benro Travel Angel series (aluminum), weighs just over 1kg incl the ballhead, extends to 1.35m, folds down to 35cm in length. Easy enough to adjust each leg with 3 different variations & holds the camera firmly (up to 6kg). You can browse the collection here:

http://www.photo-shop-studio.com/eng/p2.asp?SpecialOffer=&ItemClass1=BENRO+Tripod+%26+Ball+head&ItemClass2=BENRO&ItemClass3=BENRO+ALUMINIUM++TRIPODS+A%2D+Series+%2 6+EX%2D+Series&ItemClass4=%2D&viewresult=&viewresult2=&type=&searchword=&RecStart=0

They've got an ebay account too which works out a little cheaper (free shipping). Mine was $215. I'll provide some photos if you want :) If you go for a cheaper tripod then its either going to a) fall apart b) won't support your heavy camera & fall down. Better to get one that'll last a lifetime

For a camera bag, I first got a Lowepro Atlus 160 for $20 which is alright although a little bulky even with a spare lens in there but plenty of room to put stuff on top (maybe a shirt). Nowhere to hang a tripod off it though. Once again I can take photos upon request :)

[Italian Stallion]

Yeah I tried connecting it multiple ways. Camera on, camera off, memory card in, memory card out, etc. Still no go. 3 different computers now.. nothing. The camera can tell something's plugged in - it turns the LCD screen off when I do - but nothing pops up in Windows. The screen also seems to stay off sometimes after pulling out the USB cable.. I get the feeling the connector on either the cable or the camera itself might be buggered. Going to take it back to JB a bit later and see what they say.. at least they'll have spare cables to test with!

I actually already applied the firmware update in case it happened to help my USB problem. :p

Bit more than I wanted to spend on the tripod.. it's probably not something I'd use too often. Are the cheaper Benro tripods any good? >_>

Yeah I was told Lowepro are good.. I've also got one for my little Sony P&S camera. Seems good quality. Just have to take a look at their range I suppose. Don't need anything that holds much other than the camera, a spare lens, and some batteries.

[/backslash]

Can't vouch for the cheaper Benro tripods myself but the general rule is they're all good because they're replicas of another brand that costs 4x as much yet aside from the brand name & ballhead its impossible to tell the difference. I chose the Travel Angel because I wanted it to be lightweight, tall-ish yet small when folded although truth be told its about $100 more than I wanted to spend but meh, I'm pretty happy with it :)

For the camera bags I recommend checking it out in person, get the store person to use their demo K-X to put into the bag, see whats best. Which is what I should've done although my Lowepro was on clearance (RRPs for $60, I imported from MyMemory.co.uk) and if I ever need a 3rd lens it won't be a problem to carry

[StorminNorman]

Couple of other quick questions: Are those super fast SD cards worth getting? At $90 for 16GB they're basically double the price of regular stuff. Will I need one/should I get one?

If you use drive mode, or just snap a lot of shots quickly, then you'll absolutely need a fast memory card. I really curse only getting a Grade 4 rather than a Grade 6 card, as my camera can do like 4fps, but the card isn't fast enough to keep up with that.

Also thinking of getting a wide angle one? Is there much difference in quality in these things, or is it all basically the same?

Lenses can vary quite dramatically in quality. In general, the more you pay, the better the lens. Because lenses have to be made by hand, they always tend to be expensive.

If you're doing a lot of landscape shooting, then a wide-angle lens is a must. The difference between my 18-55mm kit lens at the wide end (18mm) and my 11-17mm wide-angle lens is astonishing, despite the 1mm difference if you go full zoom on the wide-angle.

A decent wide-angle lens could run you the better part of $1000, but you might get lucky like I did and pick one up for half that (I got a $900 Tamron wide-angle for $400 because it was a discontinued model).

In unrelated news, my Mum and my sister have decided to go halves in getting me a new camera bag, so I can finally lug all four of my lenses around.

[/backslash]

http://www1.dealextreme.com/productimages/sku_5483_5.jpg

Remote trigger for my Pentax camera - only $4 with free shipping + battery! And by reports it works well for Pentax (or any other brands). Figured it might be useful

[Manny M]

Definitely useful for shots with a slow shutter speed, and for 4 bucks who can complain!?

[/backslash]

Yeah, thats what I thought for that price :D Was looking at ebay where it was going for $14 which was cheap enough but then I found that website. It'll be handy for self-portrait shots which are impossible to focus without one

[Italian Stallion]

Any idea how it works with the bulb setting? I'm keen to get one too, but I don't want to sit there holding the button for 3 hours! Some remotes you can press once to engage it, and again to disengage.. can't really tell with this one though?

[/backslash]

From what I read on the Pentax forums

That action is available in the camera already. All you need to do is select that mode of operation, and then any old remote trigger will do the job:

Menu > C2 > Item 12: Remote Control Shooting in Bulb Mode > Select 'Mode 1' - 'Push remote control release button once to start exposure and a second time to end'.

I've only just bought it online so of course I don't have it yet

[Manny M]

Some remotes you can press once to engage it, and again to disengage.. can't really tell with this one though?

I would've thought that's how they'd always work. Can't imagine anyone holding a button for over 30 seconds.

[Italian Stallion]

Oh absolutely. And based on what backslash quoted before, it's a function in-built in the camera rather than the remote itself. Based on something like this (http://cgi.ebay.com.au/Remote-Cord-Pentax-K7-K20D-K10D-K200D-K100D-CS-205_W0QQitemZ360238457900QQcmdZViewItemQQptZAU_Cam eras_Photographic_Accessories?hash=item53dfe2a42c) , where it is built into the remote, I thought all had to have some sort of functionality to 'hold' the button, a digital kinda remote doing it in some fancy digital way! But it seems I was wrong and any remote will do it.

[Manny M]

I'm in the market for a tripod and was thinking of Manfrotto till I realised how bloody expensive they are.

I'm not looking for anything amazing at the moment, something that will just 'do the job' is good enough for me right now. That being said, does anyone have any opinions on the following Giottos VT809 3-Section Tripod with 3-Way Pan/Tilt Head (or Giottos tripods in general)?

http://d-d-photographics.com.au/tripods.htm


Alternatively, if the above really suck, this is probably the only Manfrotto I could afford right now. Thoughts?

http://d-d-photographics.com.au/tripod.htm#190XDB

[/backslash]

Those prices are a bit overkill and the net weight could be much better. I suggest browsing through some Benros which are replicas of Gitzo at 1/4 of the price :) Awesome quality, I've got one that supports up to 6kg and it only weighs 1kg. Max of 1.35m, fold length at 35cm

http://www.photo-shop-studio.com/eng/p2.asp?ItemClass1=BENRO+Tripod+%26+Ball+head

[Serenity]

Okay, so I'm seriously considering getting a 5D within the next twelve months. I'm not sure if I want a mark I or a mark II yet, the mark I will be significantly cheaper but the mark II has had a bit of a bump up in specs and sensor size, so on and so forth.

Also I'm kicking myself, I lost my tripod mount. I don't even know how, I never unscrew it...Unless my father borrowed my camera. I have no idea what happened to it. :(

[sheeps]

Hey dudes. I'm selling my Canon HV40 if anyone's interested. It's a sweet camera but I never use it. As a result, though, it's pretty much in new condition.
http://melbourne.gumtree.com.au/c-Stuff-for-Sale-video-camera-digital-camera-CANON-HV40-WD-H43-WIDE-ANGLE-LENS-ALSO-AVAILABLE-W0QQAdIdZ193368895

[Bob the Destroyer]

I'm looking to buy a digital video camera (specifically the Kodak Playsport (http://store.kodak.com/store/ekconsus/en_US/pd/PLAYSPORT_Video_Camera/productID.169976100)
but living where I do, the chances of a camera shop getting stock is laughable.

Anyone want to recommend a good online place?

[sheeps]

I bought my video camera from ryda.com.au.

I've also had good sales with digitalcamerawarehouse.com.au (Also, they have bricks and mortar stores so they're a bit more trustworthy)

I've also found http://www.digitalrev.com/ recently but not sure what they're like.

I always search whirlpool forums to check website for user opinions.

Also, if you're looking for a video camera... I'm selling one :P but I guess it's probably a little out of your price range.

[Ad-Rock]

I'm going to South Africa for the world cup in a couple of months and I want a good camera to take along, but I know little more than the basics about them.

We are going on a safari so I'd need a fairly good zoom for some wildlife photography. Also, I'd like to take photos of the soccer, so a camera that takes good action shots would be nice.

So, I need some help. Any recommendations on cameras, camera suppliers or websites which could get my camera knowledge up to scratch would be greatly appreciated.

TYIA

[StorminNorman]

For what you want, a DSLR would be optimal, but pricey.

If you want a really capable regular camera, have a look at the Powershot S90. It's about $600 worth of camera, but offers a lot more capability and flexibility than a $200 P&S, without the extra cost and infrastructure that comes with a DSLR.

If you do want to lash out on a proper DSLR, then have a look at the Canon EOS550D. It's the new generation of the EOS "consumer" line, updating the 500D and 450D that some of us on this forum already use.

It just depends how much money you're willing to throw at it. Honestly, for a big trip, I wouldn't look at spending less than $500. The girl with whom I love took a cheap P&S with her to Korea and Japan recently, and the photos it produced were less than optimal, and certainly not worthwhile for saving memories of such a trip.

In short: The more you spend, the more your purchase will reward you with awesome shots. ;)

[sheeps]

Check out the micro 4/3s cameras from Olympus and Panasonic. Some sweet little cameras.

[StorminNorman]

I saw the EPL-1 in JB the other day. It made me all tingly.

Micro Four Thirds is the future of high-end non-DSLRs.

[Joel]

anyone here shoot film? i use a nikon d3000 as digital but it just doesn't compare to any of my film slrs

[igotnewsuper8systemWRONG!]

Hey camera guys, whats a good camera to buy? I'm just going to be doing general photo taking and don't want to spend too much. While I'm at it, what's this I hear about taking a new camera through customs and getting the tax back?

[igotnewsuper8systemWRONG!]

That's pretty sweet, any cameras you recommend?

[/backslash]

If you're going for a pointnshoot a Canon IXUS 80/90/100 is fine. Although I haven't done any research in the past 1.5 years but its decent quality

[/backslash]

Canon IXUS 105IS is currently $198 at HN, limit of 1 per customer - good price if you're interested in a pointnshoot igotnewsuper8

Also the Sony A350 DSLR twin lens kit is currently half price for $582 at Officeworks, normally over $1000. Can be bought from Officeworks either instore or online
http://www.ozbargain.com.au/node/24919

[igotnewsuper8systemWRONG!]

Hey thanks for th advice, I just picked up and IXUS 100IS. It's so ****ing pretty.

[Nic Xtreme]

Finally bought a Canon 1000D in preparation for my holiday in July ^_^

It was $683 with an 18-55 IS lens and I added a chunky warranty to it. Very happy with my purchase! Now to wait for the battery to charge >_>

After I play with it a bit I'll have to pester you /slashy on your opinions on must-have unnecessary accessories! The lady at the register already to me that I absolutely *must* buy a 50mm f/1.8 lens.

[sheeps]

Doh. If you waited maybe a week or two I could've sold you mine. :D

[banjoeskimo]

Holy shit! My wife decided to team up with my parents and spring for an early birthday present. Just found out that I have a shiny, brand new Canon 550D in the mail, due to arrive next week.

If anyone needs me, I'll be outside running in excited circles. :D

In other news, anyone interested in picking up my current 350D? I've got a copy of CS3 Design Premium and some memory cards I'd be willing to throw in for free (got a free copy of CS4 a few months back, and the 550D takes SD cards instead of my old CF cards.) Let's say around $350?

[/backslash]

I'll give you $350 for your 550D :D
banjoeskimo: "Sure ok!" *thinks* "Waaaait a second, 550D?!"

Unfortunately its way too late for me now, as you know ;) Congrats on getting a new camera! You clearly deserved it

[Clift]

Ok, so lately I've been getting around a fair bit and more often then not I'll encounter something and say to myself "God damn, if I had a decent camera, that would be a sweet picture!"

Alongside that, I'm going down to Phillip Island for the MotoGP this year so I want to be able to get some good shots. :)

So the question I put to you guys, who quite clearly know a lot more about camera's and photography in general than I; What camera would you recommend that falls in the ~$400 mark? (Obviously I'm willing to splurge out slightly). :)

[/backslash]

So the question I put to you guys, who quite clearly know a lot more about camera's and photography in general than I; What camera would you recommend that falls in the ~$400 mark? (Obviously I'm willing to splurge out slightly). :)
If you're looking at ~$400, buy banjoeskimo's camera ;)

[banjoeskimo]

Ok, so lately I've been getting around a fair bit and more often then not I'll encounter something and say to myself "God damn, if I had a decent camera, that would be a sweet picture!"

Alongside that, I'm going down to Phillip Island for the MotoGP this year so I want to be able to get some good shots. :)

So the question I put to you guys, who quite clearly know a lot more about camera's and photography in general than I; What camera would you recommend that falls in the ~$400 mark? (Obviously I'm willing to splurge out slightly). :)

Want mine? It's only $350 and it comes with 2 memory cards (a 1GB and a 4GB) and CS3 Design Premium (which includes Photoshop so you can post-process your photos.)

As previously mentioned, my wife just planned an early birthday surprise and upgraded me to a 550D, and I've no use for a second camera body so I'm getting rid of it.

I'm not putting it up for sale until next week when my new camera arrives, but if you want to call dibs on it early it'd save me the trouble of putting it up in the auction hut. If you want an idea of what it can do, you can check out my photography portfolio here (http://banjoeskimo.daportfolio.com/), my deviantART account here (http://eibach.deviantart.com/gallery/), or the Hyperactive photography thread here (http://www.hyper.com.au/forums/showthread.php?t=17059) (if you go to the last few pages I've posted tonnes of stuff.)

[Clift]

Some very nice pics you've got there. :)

You know what? I'll take it off your hands.

Send me a PM (Or just post in here) when the time comes and we'll sort it all out. :D

[banjoeskimo]

Sounds great! The new camera should be here between the 26th and the 28th. I'll be in touch once I've got the 550D up and running. :D

[/backslash]

Want mine? It's only $350 and it comes with 2 memory cards (a 1GB and a 4GB) and CS3 Design Premium (which includes Photoshop so you can post-process your photos.)
Clift: "Do you come with the camera?"
banjoeskimo: "Oh you! Tee-hee-hee-hee!"

It'd be a lot easier to take photos with him around :p I'm out of the loop, again. I don't practice enough to memorise anything until something happens & then I botch it up

[StorminNorman]

So anyway, my sister went and got herself a 500D today. Now she's lording it over me because it's "better" than my 450D. :(

[/backslash]

You can 1up her if you can take better photos than she can ;)

[StorminNorman]

I console myself with the fact I have better lenses.

[Nic Xtreme]

I've recently returned from a holiday where we were moving around quite a bit for many of my photos and for a lot of it I was just snap-happy. I'm looking at many of those quick-snap photos and the sky is white in...most of them. Any recommendations on some filters that can overcome this problem in situations where I'm not planning photos and adjusting settings, and in a bit of a rush, moving through a lot of different environments?

[StorminNorman]

Get a polarising filter. It'll darken the image by about half a stop, but your camera should be able to compensate.

It's essentially the filter they use to get that "bluer-than-blue" sky effect you see in professional photography (and on Top Gear).

[/backslash]

Polarising filter is about the only one you'll need if you're planning on taking a lot of outdoor photos :) Good investment

The more expensive Polarising filters give you richer colours than the cheaper ones. Hoya or Kenko is a good brand (Kenko are made from the same company under a different name & are cheaper)

[Nic Xtreme]

Cheers! I'll have to nab one. I'll check out those brands now.

EDIT: Bought :D

[StorminNorman]

You should always make sure you at least have a clear "protective" filter for all your lenses. I have filters permanently attached to my lenses.

[Nic Xtreme]

You should always make sure you at least have a clear "protective" filter for all your lenses. I have filters permanently attached to my lenses.

I've got one for my most-used-outdoors one, but not for the others yet <_<

I'll probably regret it one day if I don't buy one for them each...

[shallowdays]

Just got myself an EOS 550D. Anyone got any tips on how to become a world-renowned photographer?

[banjoeskimo]

I too am the proud owner of a new 550D. Clift, you still want my 350D? Check your PM box!

[Serenity]

Nice.

To those who haven't heard, I've had the 5D mark II for nearly 3 months now. Brilliant piece of kit. The longing for an L lens is getting really unbearable though, but I don't know what I'd get if I were to get any in the near future. I'm supposed to be saving because of the fact I'm starting uni next year (Mass Communication, majoring in Film/TV and also photography), but I want to start getting lighting gear sorted too. I don't even know what L lens I'd get, I love the look of the 135L but it's such a tricky focal distance. Then there's your typical 70-200L, probably looking at the 2.8 one with no IS. Zoom is just very, very convenient but the image quality usually isn't as good as primes. Plus I need something longer in my arsenal, I've really only got my nifty fifty and my 70mm Sigma macro.

So yeah, absolutely no idea where to go from here in terms of lenses, but I desperately want to start setting up a lighting arrangement. Got a reflector, so I'm all set for anything natural light. :D

[Manny M]

When it comes to lenses buy what you know you have a need for. If you don't have a good telephoto go for the 70-300, though I would recommend the IS as it gives you an effective 2 stops which you'll need for crisp zoomed shots where camera shake can be a bitch. Not cheap though.

[Clift]

Well Banjoe just confirmed that my money has gone through. :D

Anyone care to throw some tips / info at someone who has extremely limited exposure to DSLR's? :p

[Manny M]

Honestly, one of the best things you can do is just muck around with it. Go through the settings and see how each influences your picture. Pick a subject and take the same shot using different iso, shutter speed, aperture and see what you come up with. The next best thing i did after getting my grip around the camera was to take an intro course. If you're in Sydney I highly recommend the Australian Centre of Photography in Paddington. They taught me how to use manual modes effectively, how metering works, how you can balance shutter speed and aperture to get the right effect, etc.

General starting point in terms of settings;

The higher the ISO setting, the higher the shutter speed you can use to take a photo (effective in low light generally). Disadvantage is that the higher ISO settings introduce noise into your photo.

The higher the shutter speed, the faster your camera will take the shot. The general rule when wanting to take a sharp shot by hand, is that your shutter speed should be no slower than 1/30th of a second. Any slower than that and you risk hand shake creating blur or even a moving subject creating blur. Slower shutter speeds can be very beneficial in low light scenarios but only with still subjects really.

The higher the aperture (the lower the number, ie f/1.5 is higher than f/5.0) the less the focal distance. This works well to focus on an object and blur everything around it (backgrounds in particular) but doesn't work as well for landscapes or if you have a scene which you want most of it in focus. Another point with aperture is the higher the aperture the faster the shutter speed can be to shoot on the meter (on the meter basically meaning with accurate/adequate light). So if you want to shoot with a low aperture (f/11) you'll need a decent amount of light to keep the shutter speed high.


That's not a bad start to understanding photography. Remember, you should always have an understanding and appreciation of light and how that can affect your photo. Does it affect your shooting speed, the mood of your photo, is it creating unnecessary shadows, is it removing desired shadows... Etc.

[Clift]

Just finished pulling everything out of the neat package from Banjoe. :D

Quite excited! Will have a flick through the manual before I have a quick play around. ^_^

[StorminNorman]

You might also want to look at this wikitron article (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_digital_camera_modes), for a more general overview of what the various modes do.

There's actually a lot of good info there about photography basics which might be worth looking into.

[shallowdays]

Can anyone recommend me a wide angle lens to go with my 550D? I'm no professional so I don't need the most awesome and expensive lens out there.

[Italian Stallion]

How much do you have in mind to spend, when you say 'not the most awesome and expensive'?

The Sigma 10-20 is pretty popular, and one of the cheaper (common) wide angle lenses you'll find. My limited experiences with it have been good. They have a new 8-16 out too, which is meant to be good for the price. Anything much longer probably won't be all that wide given the crop factor on the 550d. Next step up would probably be Canon's 10-22, which would cost you another $400 or so, for something which isn't all that much better. If you really want to spend the cash, the 10-20 f3.5 or 8-16.

I'm sure others will have more input on the topic, but after looking into wide angle lenses myself, the Sigmas seemed to be the most viable.

[shallowdays]

How much do you have in mind to spend, when you say 'not the most awesome and expensive'?
Somewhere between $400 and $800 I'd say.

[Italian Stallion]

Then yeah, the Sigma 10-20 is probably the best choice - and one of the only! Wide angles tend to be pretty expensive.

[StorminNorman]

I got a $900 Tamron 11-17mm lens for $400 last year. Was pretty happy about that.

[shallowdays]

Then yeah, the Sigma 10-20 is probably the best choice - and one of the only! Wide angles tend to be pretty expensive.
Grabbed myself one of these today and walked down to the harbour to test it out. So far I'm liking it. Thanks for the advice.

[Italian Stallion]

Good to hear you're enjoying it! Got any sample shots you've taken with it? I've got my eye on one going on eBay shortly..

[turb06]

has anyone had any experience with POV video cameras, mainly gopro motorsport hero or drift innovations x170?

[banjoeskimo]

Quick question for anyone who shoots RAW: is there any way to tag RAW images in the same way you can for JPEGs? I just made the jump to shooting RAW in the last month, but I'm yet to figure out tagging.

Normally when shooting JPEG I'd just upload the images to my PC, then right-click / properties and add in the tagging data via Windows.

I'm still able to to this with my RAW images, however it saves everything to an xmp file and not the RAW image itself. Is it possible to write the tagging data to the RAW image itself? If not, will the tagging data saved in the xmp files be searchable to Windows?

As it stands I'm able to search my entire photo database from Windows via the tags I've applied to my images (e.g. location of shoot, subject), I just want to know if I can continue to do the same thing with my RAW photos.

[Manny M]

Why wouldn't you just do that after you process them into jpegs/pngs etc?

[sheeps]

I still have tagging done in Lightroom but I'm not sure if that's attached to the image itself or just in the lightroom library.

[banjoeskimo]

Why wouldn't you just do that after you process them into jpegs/pngs etc?

Because I don't process every single shot I take, and translating all of them into jpegs/pngs would take up even more room. Furthermore, I don't want to lose the RAW shots and having them correspond to other files is a pain in the ass, I just want to be able to search the originals.

[sheeps]

http://www.downloadsquad.com/2009/10/21/raw-image-support-windows/ does this help at all?

[Italian Stallion]

How's that Sigma going for you, shallowdays? I'm considering picking one up in the next few days.