PDA

View Full Version : Hitler's 39 living relatives revealed


Fenrir
16-09-2009, 03:23 AM
Hitler's 39 living relatives revealed
ALLAN HALL, BERLIN
September 15, 2009

Thirty-nine living relatives of Adolf Hitler have been discovered by a customs official and a journalist who claim to have decoded the Nazi dictator's DNA.

Analysing forgotten cigarette butts in a small village in lower Austria, a used paper serviette in a New York fast food restaurant and the seals of letters sent over 30 years ago from northern France, Marc Vermeeren and Jean-Paul Mulders said they had traced all known living relatives of the Fuehrer for the first time.

As well as three living in America, whose existence has been reported previously, they claim to have tracked down 36 others who still live in the wooded area of Austria where Hitler was born.

Mr Vermeeren, a Belgian customs official, and Mulders, a journalist for Belgian newspaper Het Laaste Nieuws, said three great-grandchildren of Hitler's father, Alois, lived on Long Island, outside New York, under the false name Stuart-Houston. They are descendants who left Germany to escape the Nazis.

Louis and Brian Stuart-Houston share a little wooden house in East Patchogue, where they work as gardeners, while Alexander is a retired psychologist who helps Vietnam veterans.

The Belgians said they had watched them for seven days and nights, following 60-year-old Alexander to a fast-food restaurant where he disposed of a paper serviette after eating fried chicken that they retrieved and later matched with ''DNA of Hitler that we keep in a sealed, armoured chest'', according to Mulders.

The cigarette butts came from Hitler relatives in Austria, they said.

''The American relatives have agreed not to have children to extinguish the saga of Hitler and stop living in fear, but have promised to publish a book before they die,'' said Mulders.
Oh, **** off.

Source, btw. (http://www.theage.com.au/world/hitlers-39-living-relatives-revealed-20090914-fnu6.html)

It's about time the collective of society admitted to its inane preoccupation with positing Hitler as the one exception to our every developed principal - I'm sick of the double standards, and the reductio ad Hitlerum (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_Hitlerum) poisoning very nearly every strand of social or political debate. I pick this as the final straw because we're now pretty much playing a blatant eugenic discrimination card of our own - or at least, journalism is merely shrugging its shoulders in some form of natural acknowledgement that the "evil Hitler genes" must not be passed on.

Discuss.

big_b
16-09-2009, 03:46 AM
sounds like a load of bollocks to me.

Fenrir
16-09-2009, 03:52 AM
Hmm, I'm not the only one whose scepticometer was playing up a bit whilst reading this article?

(my thoughts on society's preoccupation with Hitler as the token reference point of evil IRL still stand)

CoolzInferno
16-09-2009, 03:56 AM
This blog post (http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?topic_id=101942) about Inglourious Basterds relates to this to some extent. I'd elaborate but it's a hideous hour of morning and I have an overdue assignment I'm midway through. It kind breaks down the film somewhat and discusses the whole argument of why we are seemingly more than happy to view Nazis as heartless villains and condone and possibly even cheer acts of brutal violence, simply because they're Nazis.

Its a completely absurd argument really. Yes, Hitler wasn't a particularly nice guy but does simply having some commonality in DNA suddenly lead to becoming 'evil'. The label of sub-human, cancerous, spreadable evil that gets slapped on to him with things like this is really just ridiculous.

edit: Whilst the article does seem rather dubious, the possibility of people that are intent on hunting down Hitler's relatives isn't too outlandish. There already exist groups of "Nazi Hunters" who attempt to hunt down suspected former Nazis to bring them to trial for warcrimes so I can't see why it wouldn't be the case there are people searching and trying to extinguish/monitor the offspring of Hitler.

sausage
16-09-2009, 05:42 AM
I'd be more worried about Stalin's living relatives - he was a bigger prick than Hitler.

Still, it's all bollocks anyway.

ThePhotoshop
16-09-2009, 06:27 AM
The most important part of this article is the fact that they have Hitler's DNA.

You know what this means?

They can clone him.

Xanafalgue
16-09-2009, 06:49 AM
Ridiculous.

TAT
16-09-2009, 07:31 AM
Put me down for "this is a load of shit/waste of time".

How about we focus on insane dictators that are still in power

Halt, Hammerzeit
16-09-2009, 07:49 AM
We can do that. It's not nice to meddle in the leadership of another country (unless you're the US).

This has got to be the biggest waste of resources ever. If there's 36 people that haven't come forward, don't you think that means that 36 people are sick of being compared to Hitler just because he was their great-grand uncle? I don't think anybody would want to be compared to that.

Cicada
16-09-2009, 08:25 AM
This story had me completely baffled. People who fled Nazi Germany and are related to Hitler but not descended from him, must not have children, just in case the Holocaust gene is a recessive one that might pop up when you least expect it. It's such bullshit that I can only hope it isn't true.

Azzaman
16-09-2009, 08:41 AM
Seriously wtf? These journalists had nothing better to do then go fishing through dumpsters of long forgotten relatives of a long dead genocidal tyrant?

Ali G
16-09-2009, 09:36 AM
Like everyone else said, this is screwed. I find it ****ing terrible that they actually followed the poor guy for a week and then dug through garbage to find a serviette that he'd used.

Saxby
16-09-2009, 10:05 AM
Those poor people, stalked by DNA scientists!

Xanafalgue
16-09-2009, 10:45 AM
Those poor people, stalked by DNA scientists!

Well when you put it like that it almost sounds like a plot for a Capcom game.

REQUIEM
20-09-2009, 02:35 PM
If they arent goosestepping Nazi jew murderers what is the importance??