Reputation System Feedback

[Ashmaran]

Post any feedback in here.

As I said in the announcement, the system has been enabled on a trial basis to see how we go. We are trying to be as flexible as possible with the system so that we can settle on something that works for everyone.

[AranchineD]

As I said in the interesting developments thread, I don't think messages are adding points right now. Going to add it in, right?



But yes. IT'S GOOD TO BE BACK

[Ashmaran]

Hmm I just rebuilt it after resetting the stuff... it should be working I haven't tweaked the pep power settings. Will take a look, pepping you for testing purposes.

[JimmyKane]

I don't want grey pep, it reminds me of my Andy Foers pep on UYAC.

[AranchineD]

Hmm I just rebuilt it after resetting the stuff... it should be working I haven't tweaked the pep power settings. Will take a look, pepping you for testing purposes.

Hmm, still doesn't seem to be working.


Well, doesn't matter, until it gets fixed, I can still enjoy pepping Second with images of Smithers.

[Ashmaran]

Hmm it should be working now, but not sure if it will retroactively grant points for the last 10 mins or so :p

[JimmyKane]

'tis.

Let's roll.

[AranchineD]

Yep, there we go. Here comes fun.

[TSplodey]

I'm gonna pep Ashmaran for such good work!

[Ashmaran]

Haha that's the spirit. Also please post here if you think there's some information missing from the guideline post. Trying to make the system as transparent as possible.

[Jickle]

This time I'm pretty confident I can beat gaselite to 10,000 points.

Or at least...100 points. If he ever rejoins I'm screwed.

[Watchers]

I'm gonna pep Ashmaran for such good work!

I'm going to nep Ash for taking so damn long. :mad:

[JimmyKane]

I'm gonna nepskrieg Watchers for his outdated location/avatar.

[Watchers]

O crap my location...

[JimmyKane]

It sure does.

[TAT]

The limits of reps/day & reps to spread, please

I'm going to celebrate with a shower of nep

[BB2K]

I'm going to celebrate with a shower of nep

I'd get that checked out if I were you.

[TAT]

Lets pretend that my nep is Omega AIDS and we'll see how long it takes before everyone is infected. If you are infected you are obliged to pass the disease onto others.

Starting from NOW!

[AranchineD]

You have given out too much Reputation in the last 24 hours, try again later

OOPS

I guess your game doesn't work.

Too bad.

[Ingram]

Mighta been asked and answered but I care not.

I'm wondering if you can or will you be able to see the rep you've been given? I found it uplifting to see who and why I got rep from, like for being awesome. I like being told exactly what I did that was so awesome to make another user click on a button and type in a message about how awesome I am.

Please?

[AranchineD]

You already can, someone just has to give you pep first for the list to show up. >_>

[Ingram]

Ah sweet, I thought maybe I already had pep because I had a green dot.

I guess I've not been awesome yet :p

[fishfishmonkeyhat]

OOPS

I guess your game doesn't work.

Too bad.

I gave him Double-back Omega AIDS. :\

[/backslash]

Ah sweet, I thought maybe I already had pep because I had a green dot.

I guess I've not been awesome yet :p
It'll be under 'User CP' under your subscribed threads. I just gave you some ;) But I had a reason behind it, wasn't random pep

[Ingram]

Ah yep I see it now, totally awesome!

I gave you pep earlier just because you're awesome and stuff.

;)

[aubergine]

Guidelines seem good. I'd like to see an advisory regarding any single user excessively nepping a single user. "Spread" with pep, not nep, and avoid simply nepping every post of a user you dislike. Or words to that effect.

[IRS]

This makes me feel like Rocky in Rocky6.

Old man goes for glory one more time.















It's not over til it's over

[REQUIEM]

Here we go again.

[AranchineD]

Guidelines seem good. I'd like to see an advisory regarding any single user excessively nepping a single user. "Spread" with pep, not nep, and avoid simply nepping every post of a user you dislike. Or words to that effect.

How about we don't do that

[Fenrir]

Finally, I don't have to spread to half the forum to use the damned system! Pepping Ash for this innovation.

[Lazlow]

How about we don't do that

Agreed

[Second]

how do i see rep

[Second]

i.e. Pep me you pricks.

[AranchineD]

I already did c***

[Second]

I see nothing. I see no pep list or nothin'!

[Sweating Bullets]

Cause you have not gotten any pep

[Second]

You should pep me then. I want the list.

[AranchineD]

The List.

[Sweating Bullets]

Whored myself out too much:
You have given out too much Reputation in the last 24 hours, try again later.

[Second]

That's it, mate. You just made The List.

[fishonthecarpet]

Did postcounts come back at the same time, or have they been back for a while?

... or did they never leave? I'm a bit fuzzy.

[JimmyKane]

Post counts came back moments before I think.

[fishonthecarpet]

I liked them gone. Now my small hyper e-penis is out for everybody to see.

[JimmyKane]

http://uyac.com.au/forum/images/smilies/Dealwithit1b.gif

[SOX]

Holy shit pep is back

[fishonthecarpet]

That's gotta be my favourite gif ever!

[FX-GTZ]

Awesome i can see my post count again. Just like any other forum should do.

[AranchineD]

http://img33.imageshack.us/img33/6796/black2q.png

http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/6729/blackcy.png
lololololololololololol

[texta]

It'd be cool if we could pep more people in a 24 hour period than is currently the case. Or even better, if the 24 hours could be changed to a smaller period. That way there'd be an incentive for us to visit more often. <_<

[Second]

That is a pepworthy post. Too bad I can not pep you any more.

[/backslash]

Don't worry Second, I pepped him for you ;)

What's the daily pep limit? 10?

[Second]

Something like that.

[TAT]

15, with 5 to spread.




This forum requires that you wait 30 seconds between posts. Please try again in 11 seconds.


so gay

[Ashmaran]

It'd be cool if we could pep more people in a 24 hour period than is currently the case. Or even better, if the 24 hours could be changed to a smaller period. That way there'd be an incentive for us to visit more often. <_<

Yeah it's just a blanket 24 hour window.

If there's overwhelming support for raising the number per day it can be looked at, but I think it's a fair starting point. Are people really finding more than 15 pep worthy posts per day they logon?

[Second]

I like to pep every awesome post I find. Sometimes there's more awesome posts and I'm like "I'll pep it tomorrow" and then tomorrow comes and I'm all "****, I might need that pepping power for later!" and then I never pep that awesome post and the awesomeness is never realised and then I get distracted by a scrolling user title and end my post sud

[texta]

I've found today that it went very quickly.

The argument for keeping the restriction at that level would be that it forces people to be a bit wiser with who they pep, but on the other hand if we have looser restrictions then it would help limit the power of pep and help stop things getting out of control.

[Lazlow]

Gonna go through the listening thread and pep/nep based on whether I agree with their musical taste.

[AranchineD]

Gonna go through the listening thread and pep/nep based on whether I agree with their musical taste.

Sounds good to me.

[Lazlow]

Pretty lucky that the first few pages were metal loaded, think I only dished out 1 or 2 pep.

Btw I'm only repping songs I know, I'm not a complete arsehole.

[fishfishmonkeyhat]

Could we remove the confirmation popup button?

I have so few clicks to spare!

[ireadtabloids]

So does this mean the return of the adoption threads? ;)

[JimmyKane]

That had very little to do with rep...

[TAT]

someone doesn't know squat about adoption

[JimmyKane]

The same ****ing thing can be done with PMs.

...Right?

[Nic Xtreme]

With the advent of Twitter, we can all end our pep with tags that cannot be tracked!

Also postcount is back in the public eye. I did not notice this >_>

[AranchineD]

So I see that the moderators will find any excuse to ban someone who they don't like, but if someone who has friends on the modding team does exactly the same thing, they get away with it without even a casual warning.

Typical.

[FrozenSoul80]

So I see that the moderators will find any excuse to ban someone who they don't like

I'm mad with power, I don't need an excuse.

No, wait, what? What are we complaining about now? No one is getting special treatment that I'm aware of.

[TAT]

Who is Aran referring to?

[Second]

SYT!! :p

[Spazzola]

Assuming it was Syt, weren't the accounts just merged?

[TAT]

Yes! Syt and Sytadel were merged to avoid a shitstorm.

Jesus what the **** is wrong with you guys; KEEP UP

[Lazlow]

The insufferable faglords are back!

[AranchineD]

IT BEGINShttp://google.jpg

[FrozenSoul80]

Yes! Syt and Sytadel were merged to avoid a shitstorm.

Jesus what the **** is wrong with you guys; KEEP UP

They were not merged. I saw Syt using both accounts, which is against the rules, and told him one of them had to go. It was our mistake his old account was unbanned when he already had an active account, so I didn't punish him for it.

Why is this an issue?

[TAT]

They were not merged.
Pretty sure Ash or Bob merged them after that

[FrozenSoul80]

Why am I always the last to know about stupid decisions? >_<

[Spudzilla]

http://img33.imageshack.us/img33/6796/black2q.png

http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/6729/blackcy.png
lololololololololololol

Comments on his profile page have been deleted and disabled.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v346/SpeedFighter/Whacking%20Day/Untitled-11.jpg

[Spudzilla]

So is it okay for me to pep/nep people who have their rep disabled, such as FX-GTZ, for the purpose of spreading so I can pep/nep a post I actually want to?

http://img340.imageshack.us/img340/3650/thesimpsonss05e04rosebu.jpg

[Australian Ninja]

Dumb question time.

Where does it show you pep etc? In the old system you went to a page and it showed comments and who left them. What is there now in place of that, and where is it?

All I see is a green dot on some pages....

[adam_91vn]

usercp at the top of the page on the left

[Ashmaran]

So is it okay for me to pep/nep people who have their rep disabled, such as FX-GTZ, for the purpose of spreading so I can pep/nep a post I actually want to?

http://img340.imageshack.us/img340/3650/thesimpsonss05e04rosebu.jpg

I really can't recommend that especially if it means you are giving it to the same person a lot. Reputation can be re-enabled at any time and all the comments will be there. Find a post worth commenting on from someone who is taking part in the system.

[Lazlow]

http://img340.imageshack.us/img340/3650/thesimpsonss05e04rosebu.jpg

[Ryan Hayward]

Is this a game of spot the difference?

[AranchineD]

http://img340.imageshack.us/img340/3650/thesimpsonss05e04rosebu.jpg

[dinopoke]

http://img340.imageshack.us/img340/3650/thesimpsonss05e04rosebu.jpg

[fishfishmonkeyhat]

http://i348.photobucket.com/albums/q321/fishfishmonkeyhat/My%20Photoshops/SimpsonFreak.png

[Australian Ninja]

Why is this thread in here and not in general? Don't tell me it's because it's called 'feedback', it has nothing to do with the mag.

[Stevorooni]

er...


Mag or site related feedback

[Vindik8or]

That can't be a serious post, but in case it is:

Mag or site related feedback - Last checked by a mod: 1998

Not only are you being pedantic at a level that even I cannot respect, you're basing it on an assumption that is entirely wrong.

EDIT: Dangit.

[Australian Ninja]

Ohhh smallprint. Yeah missed that on account of not looking at the front page / main directory and skipping to other parts of the site.

And wrong assumptions are the best kind, I'm thinking of running a course on them by the way......

[Lazlow]

http://img340.imageshack.us/img340/3650/thesimpsonss05e04rosebu.jpg

[ley-cyrus]

http://www.webcam-steamate.com/cookies/35/b/happy.gif

Reputation of a social entity (a person, a group of people, an organization) is an opinion about that entity, typically a result of social evaluation on a set of criteria. It is important in education, business, and online communities.

Reputation may be considered as a component of the identity as defined by others.

Reputation is known to be an ubiquitous, spontaneous and highly efficient mechanism of social control in natural societies. It is a subject of study in social, management and technological sciences. Its influence ranges from competitive settings, like markets, to cooperative ones, like firms, organisations, institutions and communities. Furthermore, reputation acts on different levels of agency, individual and supra-individual. At the supra-individual level, it concerns groups, communities, collectives and abstract social entities (such as firms, corporations, organizations, countries, cultures and even civilizations). It affects phenomena of different scale, from everyday life to relationships between nations. Reputation is a fundamental instrument of social order, based upon distributed, spontaneous social control.